<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Review Sites Revisted</title>
	<atom:link href="http://backlinkage.com/conversion/review-sites-revisted/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://backlinkage.com/conversion/review-sites-revisted/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 01:27:35 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sean@US Medical Supplies</title>
		<link>http://backlinkage.com/conversion/review-sites-revisted/comment-page-1/#comment-191</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean@US Medical Supplies</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 16:40:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://backlinkage.com/?p=154#comment-191</guid>
		<description>I guess it all depends on what you&#039;re selling. If your company offers a product that people typically have questions about prior to purchase, those review sites may come in handy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess it all depends on what you&#8217;re selling. If your company offers a product that people typically have questions about prior to purchase, those review sites may come in handy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kelly Verge</title>
		<link>http://backlinkage.com/conversion/review-sites-revisted/comment-page-1/#comment-147</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelly Verge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 04:44:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://backlinkage.com/?p=154#comment-147</guid>
		<description>@Eric-

You are absolutely right.

That&#039;s why I said that the best use of these sites in my opinion would be to use them as a basis for your own review sites (i.e. replace header and drop in your own reviews).

Your point about true honest reviews is why I like Conduit sites so well.  With a Conduit-style review site, you really are nothing more than a reporter.

Thanks for the feedback!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Eric-</p>
<p>You are absolutely right.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s why I said that the best use of these sites in my opinion would be to use them as a basis for your own review sites (i.e. replace header and drop in your own reviews).</p>
<p>Your point about true honest reviews is why I like Conduit sites so well.  With a Conduit-style review site, you really are nothing more than a reporter.</p>
<p>Thanks for the feedback!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Graudins</title>
		<link>http://backlinkage.com/conversion/review-sites-revisted/comment-page-1/#comment-146</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Graudins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 00:08:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://backlinkage.com/?p=154#comment-146</guid>
		<description>Sorry, but I don&#039;t share your enthusiasm for prepackaged review sites. This is just a sneaky way of affiliate promotion. Not a review.
To me, a review is sharing my experiences of something that I have actually used. 
Buying a site full of prewritten, positively spun content in order to make a few dollars is not a method I would use.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, but I don&#8217;t share your enthusiasm for prepackaged review sites. This is just a sneaky way of affiliate promotion. Not a review.<br />
To me, a review is sharing my experiences of something that I have actually used.<br />
Buying a site full of prewritten, positively spun content in order to make a few dollars is not a method I would use.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
